Current:Home > StocksProsecutors argue Trump "willfully and flagrantly" violated gag order, seek penalty -StockSource
Prosecutors argue Trump "willfully and flagrantly" violated gag order, seek penalty
View
Date:2025-04-14 00:53:48
Prosecutors on Tuesday alleged that former President Donald Trump violated a gag order imposed by Judge Juan Merchan in his New York criminal trial, saying Trump's "attacks" have "willfully and flagrantly" violated the order.
Trump's attorney Todd Blanche argued Tuesday that his client "very carefully" tried to comply with the rules of the order, but Merchan responded that Blanche was "losing all credibility with the court."
On March 26, Merchan issued the gag order intended to limit Trump's public statements, saying Trump had made statements that were "threatening, inflammatory, denigrating" toward public servants. The order bars Trump from commenting or causing others to comment on potential witnesses in the case, prospective jurors, court staff, lawyers in the district attorney's office and the relatives of any counsel or court staffer.
But despite the gag order, Trump continued to post on his social media platform Truth Social as well as speak publicly about it, prosecutors said Tuesday. Prosecutor Chris Conroy used 10 posts to illustrate his point, saying "the court should now hold him in contempt for each of the 10 posts."
Trump is on trial in New York for 34 felony counts for allegedly falsifying business records in connection to payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges. Prosecutors and his attorneys gave their opening statements on Monday, and the first witness, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, continued his testimony on Tuesday.
Conroy stressed that he did not want Trump to be jailed for contempt, instead calling for a $1,000 fine for each of the 10 alleged violations and for the posts to be deleted from Truth Social and the Trump campaign website.
Trump's attorney Todd Blanche argued that his client committed "no willful violation" of the gag order. He said that Trump should be allowed to respond to what he believes are statements about politics, even if they're made by a witness.
Merchan repeatedly asked Blanche to identify what those attacks were. Blanche did not offer specific examples, but said Michael Cohen, Trump's former attorney who made the payment to Daniels and who is likely to be a witness in the case, and Daniels had repeatedly criticized Trump politically in the lead-up to the trial.
"Give me one, give me the most recent one that he is responding to," Merchan said, a version of a question he asked several times.
"I don't have a particular tweet that is dispositive," Blanche said, asking why the example had to be "recent."
Merchan raised his voice in replying.
"I'm asking the questions, OK? I'm going to decide whether your client is in contempt or not, so please don't turn it around," Merchan said.
Blanche argued Trump did not believe he was violating the gag order when reposting others' content.
"Are you testifying under oath that that's his position?" Merchan asked. "I'd like to hear that. I'd like to hear that. Or do you want me to accept it just because you're saying it?"
Merchan grew increasingly frustrated with Blanche's attempts to explain Trump's allegedly inflammatory posts. He brought up a Trump post quoting Jesse Waters, the Fox News host. It was a quote, not a repost, the judge pointed out.
Merchan said Trump had to "manipulate" a keyboard, "use the shift key" and "put it in quotes," to post Watters' statement about a potential juror. He asked again what political attack Trump was responding to, and receiving no clear example from Blanche.
- In:
- Donald Trump
- Stormy Daniels
Graham Kates is an investigative reporter covering criminal justice, privacy issues and information security for CBS News Digital. Contact Graham at [email protected] or [email protected]
veryGood! (67831)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Wind-driven wildfire spreads outside a central Oregon community and prompts evacuations
- Local leaders say election districts dilute Black votes for panel governing Louisiana’s capital
- Drinking water of almost a million Californians failed to meet state requirements
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Julian Assange is now free to do or say whatever he likes. What does his future hold?
- 'I'm sorry': Texas executes Ramiro Gonzales on birthday of 18-year-old he raped and killed
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. didn’t make the debate stage. He faces hurdles to stay relevant
- Average rate on 30
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Rear Window
Ranking
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Kevin Bacon, Kyra Sedgwick bring kids Sosie and Travis to 'MaXXXine' premiere: See photos
- Here's how and when to watch Simone Biles at 2024 U.S. Olympic gymnastics trials
- Officers fatally shot a man as he held one female at knifepoint after shooting another, police say
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Victoria Kalina Shares Past Struggles With Eating Disorder and Depression
- Knicks continue to go all-in as they reach $212 million deal with OG Anunoby
- Can the 2024 Kia EV9 electric SUV replace a gas-powered family hauler?
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Knicks continue to go all-in as they reach $212 million deal with OG Anunoby
Officers fatally shot a man as he held one female at knifepoint after shooting another, police say
US weekly jobless claims fall, but the total number collecting benefits is the most since 2021
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Nevada judge denies release of ex-gang leader ahead of trial in 1996 killing of Tupac Shakur
22 million Make It Mini toys recalled after dozens report skin burns, irritation
California floats an idea to fight shoplifting that may even affect who controls Congress