Current:Home > FinanceTrump moves to dismiss federal election interference case -StockSource
Trump moves to dismiss federal election interference case
View
Date:2025-04-15 21:12:33
Former President Donald Trump made his first motion to dismiss his federal election interference case Thursday, citing what his lawyers claim is his "absolute immunity" from prosecution for actions taken while serving in the nation's highest office.
"Breaking 234 years of precedent, the incumbent administration has charged President Trump for acts that lie not just within the 'outer perimeter,' but at the heart of his official responsibilities as President," Trump's attorneys say in their filing. "In doing so, the prosecution does not, and cannot, argue that President Trump's efforts to ensure election integrity, and to advocate for the same, were outside the scope of his duties."
The filing is the first in a series of anticipated motions to dismiss the case against Trump brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith that charged him with four counts related to his alleged plot to overturn the 2020 election.
MORE: Special counsel raises more concerns over Trump's attacks on witnesses
Trump in August pleaded not guilty to charges of undertaking a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election by enlisting a slate of so-called "fake electors," using the Justice Department to conduct "sham election crime investigations," trying to enlist the vice president to "alter the election results," and promoting false claims of a stolen election as the Jan. 6 riot raged -- all in an effort to subvert democracy and remain in power.
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and denounced the charges as "a persecution of a political opponent."
While Smith's indictment specifically alleged Trump clearly acted outside the scope of his office while engaging in an unlawful conspiracy to obstruct the peaceful transfer of power, Trump's attorneys on Thursday contended that Smith "falsely claims President Trump's motives were impure" and that he "knew" reports of fraud in the election were untrue.
"...[As] the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President's motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide," they argue. "Rather, where, as here, the President's actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution."
MORE: Trump opposes special counsel's request for gag order in Jan. 6 case
Trump's attorneys hinge at least part of their argument of Trump's immunity on his acquittal by the Senate following his impeachment in the wake of the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol.
"The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate," they say. "Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct... The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate."
And rather than take the position that the actions taken by Trump leading up to the Jan. 6 attack fell within the "outer perimeter" of his duties -- including his pressure campaign against state officials to overturn his election losses, his alleged efforts to recruit the Justice Department to falsely declare the election was rife with fraud, and his push for then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject electors -- they instead make the case that such acts fell at the "heart of his constitutional duties" to ensure the election was conducted with integrity.
Judge Tanya Chutkan will likely order a briefing schedule laying out deadlines for the government to issue its response to the motion to dismiss.
veryGood! (41552)
Related
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Pitch Perfect's Adam Devine and Wife Chloe Bridges Welcome First Baby
- Drake announced for Houston Bun B concert: See who else is performing at sold-out event
- Ireland’s Constitution says a woman’s place is in the home. Voters are being asked to change that
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Sheldon Johnson, Joe Rogan podcast guest, arrested after body parts found in freezer
- Handmaid's Tale Star Madeline Brewer Joins Penn Badgley in You Season 5
- What is happening in Haiti? Here's what to know.
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- 10 years after lead poisoning, Flint residents still haven't been paid from $626.25M fund
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- A dog on daylight saving time: 'I know when it's dinner time. Stop messing with me.'
- Which movie should win the best picture Oscar? Our movie experts battle it out
- School shootings prompt more states to fund digital maps for first responders
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- 'Jersey Shore' star Mike 'The Situation' Sorrentino and wife announce birth of 3rd child
- Spending bill would ease access to guns for some veterans declared mentally incapable
- Biden signs a package of spending bills passed by Congress just hours before a shutdown deadline
Recommendation
Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
Senate to vote on first government funding package to avoid shutdown
NFL free agency 2024: Ranking best 50 players set to be free agents
Washington state achieves bipartisan support to ban hog-tying by police and address opioid crisis
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Maui officials aim to accelerate processing of permits to help Lahaina rebuild
The US is springing forward to daylight saving. For Navajo and Hopi tribes, it’s a time of confusion
CIA director returns to Middle East to push for hostage, cease-fire deal between Hamas and Israel