Current:Home > InvestAppeals court refuses to lift order blocking rule meant to expand protections for LGBTQ+ students -StockSource
Appeals court refuses to lift order blocking rule meant to expand protections for LGBTQ+ students
View
Date:2025-04-11 19:04:20
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — A federal appeals court on Wednesday refused to lift a judge’s order temporarily blocking the Biden administration’s new Title IX rule meant to expand protections for LGBTQ+ students.
The ruling from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals kept in place a preliminary injunction issued last month by a federal district judge in Kentucky. That order blocked the new rule in six states — Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia — though similar legal fights are taking place in Republican-led states across the country.
“As we see it, the district court likely concluded correctly that the Rule’s definition of sex discrimination exceeds the Department’s authority,” a three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit said in its majority ruling.
The U.S. Education Department did not immediately respond to an email and phone call seeking comment.
Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman hailed the latest ruling as “a victory for common sense.”
“For 50 years, Title IX has created equal opportunities for women and young girls in the classroom and on the field,” said Coleman, a Republican. “Today, the 6th Circuit becomes the first appellate court in the nation to stop President Biden’s blatant assault on these fundamental protections.”
Chris Hartman, executive director of the Fairness Campaign, a Kentucky-based LGBTQ+ advocacy group, warned that the ruling would endanger transgender children.
“We believe Kentucky schools have an obligation to protect all students, including transgender students, and that they should implement the new Title IX Rule regardless of the 6th Circuit’s opinion,” Hartman said in a statement Wednesday evening.
Most Republican state attorneys general have gone to court to challenge the Biden administration’s Title IX regulation that expands protections to LGBTQ+ students.
The regulation kicks in on Aug. 1, but judges have temporarily blocked enforcement while the legal cases move ahead in 15 states: Alaska, Indiana, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.
The regulation faces legal challenges from 12 other states where enforcement has not been paused: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota and South Carolina.
Republicans argue the policy is a ruse to allow transgender girls to play on girls athletic teams. The Biden administration said the rule does not apply to athletics.
In its ruling, the 6th Circuit panel also expedited a full hearing of the case for this fall.
veryGood! (2925)
Related
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- NFL Week 16 odds: Moneylines, point spreads, over/under
- After 2 grisly killings, a small Nebraska community wonders if any place is really safe
- ICHCOIN Trading Center: Cryptocurrency value stabilizer
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Federal regulators give more time to complete gas pipeline extension in Virginia, North Carolina
- Police officer crashes patrol car into St. Louis gay bar then arrests co-owner for assault
- Pompeii’s ancient art of textile dyeing is revived to show another side of life before eruption
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Toyota recalling 1 million vehicles for potential air bag problem
Ranking
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Brad Pitt and Ines de Ramon Make Rare Public Appearance While Celebrating Their Birthdays
- A St. Louis nursing home closes suddenly, prompting wider concerns over care
- A passenger hid bullets in a baby diaper at New York’s LaGuardia Airport. TSA officers caught him
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- The Constitution’s insurrection clause threatens Trump’s campaign. Here is how that is playing out
- Jets activate Aaron Rodgers from injured reserve but confirm he'll miss rest of 2023 season
- Were your package deliveries stolen? What to know about porch piracy and what you can do about it
Recommendation
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
US senator’s son faces new charges in crash that killed North Dakota sheriff’s deputy
Cat-owner duo in Ohio shares amputee journey while helping others through animal therapy
Taylor Swift's Travis Kelce beanie was handmade. Here's the story behind the cozy hat
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Artists rally in support of West Bank theater members detained since Dec. 13
Former City of Jackson employee gets probation for wire fraud scheme
Meet the Russian professor who became mayor of a Colombian city