Current:Home > StocksTrump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case -StockSource
Trump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case
View
Date:2025-04-20 09:45:32
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Donald Trump told a federal appeals court on Wednesday that it should not speed up its consideration of whether the former president is immune from prosecution, accusing federal prosecutors of trying to rush his 2020 election subversion case through before next year’s presidential election.
“The prosecution has one goal in this case: To unlawfully attempt to try, convict, and sentence President Trump before an election in which he is likely to defeat President Biden,” defense lawyers wrote Wednesday. “This represents a blatant attempt to interfere with the 2024 presidential election and to disenfranchise the tens of millions of voters who support President Trump’s candidacy.”
The issue is of paramount significance to both sides given the potential for a protracted appeal to delay a trial beyond its currently scheduled start date of March 4. Trump faces charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election after he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, and he has denied doing anything wrong.
Trump’s legal team had appealed a trial judge’s rejection of arguments that he was protected from prosecution for actions he took as president. But special counsel Jack Smith sought to short-circuit that process by asking the Supreme Court on Monday to take up the issue during its current term, a request he acknowledged was “extraordinary” but one he said he was essential to keep the case on track.
Smith’s team simultaneously asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to expedite its consideration of Trump’s appeal, writing: “The public has a strong interest in this case proceeding to trial in a timely manner. The trial cannot proceed, however, before resolution of the defendant’s interlocutory appeal.”
The Supreme Court has indicated that it would decide quickly whether to hear the case, ordering Trump’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 20. The court’s brief order did not signal what it ultimately would do.
A Supreme Court case usually lasts several months, from the time the justices agree to hear it until a final decision. Smith is asking the court to move with unusual, but not unprecedented, speed.
Nearly 50 years ago, the justices acted within two months of being asked to force President Richard Nixon to turn over Oval Office recordings in the Watergate scandal. The tapes were then used later in 1974 in the corruption prosecutions of Nixon’s former aides.
It took the high court just a few days to effectively decide the 2000 presidential election for Republican George W. Bush over Democrat Al Gore.
If the justices decline to step in at this point, Trump’s appeal would continue at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Smith said even a rapid appellate decision might not get to the Supreme Court in time for review and final word before the court’s traditional summer break.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- A California county ditched its vote counting machines. Now a supporter faces a recall election
- We may be living in the golden age of older filmmakers. This year’s Oscars are evidence
- Unwrapping the Drama Behind the Willy Wonka-Inspired Experience
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Airlines could face more fines for mishandling wheelchairs under a Biden administration proposal
- How many people voted in the 2024 Michigan primary? Here's voter turnout data for the 2024 race
- Even without answers, Andy Reid finds his focus after Chiefs' Super Bowl parade shooting
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Utah House kills bill banning LGBTQ+ Pride flags and political views from classrooms
Ranking
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Rock legend Rod Stewart on recording some oldies-but-goodies
- A story of Jewish Shanghai, told through music
- Jennifer Hudson Hilariously Reacts to Moment She Confirmed Romance With Common
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- How Curb Your Enthusiasm's Larry David and More Stars Are Honoring Richard Lewis After His Death
- Democrat Tom Suozzi to be sworn back into Congress today after winning special election for NY-3
- Unwrapping the Drama Behind the Willy Wonka-Inspired Experience
Recommendation
Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
Cyndi Lauper inks deal with firm behind ABBA Voyage for new immersive performance project
Even without answers, Andy Reid finds his focus after Chiefs' Super Bowl parade shooting
Understanding the Weather Behind a Down Year for Wind Energy
Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
NYC’s plan to ease gridlock and pump billions into mass transit? A $15 toll for Manhattan drivers
Trump immunity claim taken up by Supreme Court, keeping D.C. 2020 election trial paused
Visitors line up to see and smell a corpse flower’s stinking bloom in San Francisco