Current:Home > FinanceGeorgia's highest court reinstates ban on abortions after 6 weeks -StockSource
Georgia's highest court reinstates ban on abortions after 6 weeks
View
Date:2025-04-26 13:19:28
ATLANTA — The Georgia Supreme Court Wednesday reinstated the state's ban on abortions after roughly six weeks of pregnancy, abruptly ending access to later abortions that had resumed days earlier.
In a one-page order, the justices put a lower court ruling overturning the ban on hold while they consider an appeal. Abortion providers who had resumed performing the procedure past six weeks again had to stop.
Attorneys and advocates who pushed to overturn the ban said the abrupt halt will traumatize women who must now arrange travel to other states for an abortion or keep their pregnancies.
"It is outrageous that this extreme law is back in effect, just days after being rightfully blocked," said Alice Wang, an attorney with the Center for Reproductive Rights that represented abortion providers challenging Georgia's ban. "This legal ping pong is causing chaos for medical providers trying to do their jobs and for patients who are now left frantically searching for the abortion services they need."
The state attorney general's office in a court filing said "untold numbers of unborn children" would "suffer the permanent consequences" if the state Supreme Court did not issue a stay and halt the Nov. 15 decision by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney.
McBurney ruled the state's abortion ban was invalid because when it was signed into law in 2019, U.S. Supreme Court precedent established by Roe v. Wade and another ruling allowed abortion well past six weeks.
The decision immediately prohibited enforcement of the abortion ban statewide. The state appealed and asked the Georgia Supreme Court to put the decision on hold while the appeal moved forward.
Though abortions past six weeks had resumed, some abortion providers said they were proceeding cautiously over concerns the ban could be quickly reinstated.
Georgia's ban took effect in July, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. It prohibited most abortions once a "detectable human heartbeat" was present.
Cardiac activity can be detected by ultrasound in cells within an embryo that will eventually become the heart around six weeks into a pregnancy. That means most abortions in Georgia were effectively banned at a point before many people knew they were pregnant.
The measure was passed by the state Legislature and signed into law by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp in 2019. In his ruling, McBurney said the timing — before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade — made the law immediately invalid.
Legislatures exceed their authority when they enact laws that violate a constitutional right declared by the judicial branch, he wrote.
To enact the law, the state Legislature would have to pass it again, he wrote.
The state attorney general's office in a filing with the Georgia Supreme Court blasted McBurney's reasoning as having "no basis in law, precedent, or common sense."
Plaintiffs' attorneys defended it in a reply and warned of "irreparable harm" to women if it were put on hold. They also asked the high court for 24 hours notice before issuing any stay to "avoid the potential chaos" from resuming the ban while women waited for an abortion or were in the middle of getting one.
The state Supreme Court did not conduct a hearing before issuing its order, and plaintiffs' attorneys said it denied their request for 24 hours notice.
The high court's order said seven of the nine justices agreed with the decision. It said one was disqualified and another did not participate.
veryGood! (31)
Related
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Why Twitter is an easy target for outsiders like Elon Musk intent on change
- Meta rolls out more parental controls for Instagram and virtual reality
- Canada bans China's Huawei Technologies from 5G networks
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Second convoy of U.S. citizens fleeing Khartoum arrives at Port Sudan
- How the false Russian biolab story came to circulate among the U.S. far right
- To try or not to try — remotely. As jury trials move online, courts see pros and cons
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- COMIC: How a computer scientist fights bias in algorithms
Ranking
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Russia plans to limit Instagram and could label Meta an extremist group
- Family Feud Contestant Arrested and Charged With Murdering Estranged Wife
- Sports betting ads are everywhere. Some worry gamblers will pay a steep price
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- NFL’s Damar Hamlin Supports Brother on The Masked Singer 2 Months After Cardiac Arrest
- Sephora 24-Hour Flash Sale: Take 50% Off Anastasia Beverly Hills, Clarins, Lancôme, Dermalogica, and More
- Researchers work to create a sense of touch in prosthetic limbs
Recommendation
DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
Fitbit recalls 1.7 million smartwatches with a battery that can overheat and burn you
Second American dies in Sudan amid fighting, U.S. confirms
Elon Musk says doubt about spam accounts could doom Twitter deal
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
Suspected drone attack causes oil depot fire in Russian-controlled Crimea
Netflix lays off several hundred more employees
Telegram is the app of choice in the war in Ukraine despite experts' privacy concerns